The problem is that it does not seem to work. I began recording a video, but it only lasted 20 seconds or so. So, I decided to investigate, as usual. I ran a simple little command-line program to test a bunch of card speeds.
DEV=/dev/sdc1; umount $DEV; mount $DEV sdcard/; sync; date; time dd if=/dev/zero of=sdcard/zeros.txt bs=1024 count=$((1<<17)) conv=fdatasync; date; sync; date; rm sdcard/zeros.txt; umount sdcard/
I tried this procedure with 9 different SD cards and an el-cheapo multi card reader. which you can see below:
Eye-Fi | 64MB SD from Garmin GPS | 4GB SDHC Patriot |
2GB Crucial | 2GB Sandisk Ultra II | Newer 2GB Sandisk Ultra II |
4GB Kingston | 4GB SDHC "Polariod" PNY | 4GB SDHC Transcend |
The Eye-Fi is even slower than a 64MB MicroSD card that I got with my Garmin GPS, but have never used since it is so tiny. Of those 4GB SDHC cards, I'm pretty sure none of them were over $20; they're all super generic. The Sandisk cards were about $100 when I bought the first one over three years ago.
1 comment:
Dave,
Please try your experiment with an Eye-Fi Anniversary Edition 4 GB card if you can get your hands on one. Its write speed is much-improved and has no problems recording video on the D90 (highest resolution and frame rate). The hardware inside all Eye-Fi Cards is not identical and has been improved over time.
Also, the speed of the Eye-Fi Explore Card aside, you may want to use a somewhat larger block size in your benchmark (say, 4 KB). This is more typical of what the cameras do, especially when recording videos.
Berend
Post a Comment